|
楼主 |
发表于 2018-7-31 10:49:12
|
显示全部楼层
9 h) z. |5 B% _) s9 q! X0 i
我也很喜欢这只头,起码还有一半的生命,拍时卖家不知是有意还是无意并没有提到它,也是怪,也就这台在EBAY上只有我一个人出价,很便宜地拿下了,我打开包装时看到这个头就觉得已值回货价,后来放不成,也是为了这个头才让我孜孜不倦地攻坚克难,哈哈。
+ ]1 m. G, h P! r8 J9 i; o1 t0 Y: S
" s2 k# y' S5 ]$ ~MC和MM是有本质的差别,但那个意大利玩家说的话我觉得是对的,Frank, I'll try to make a long story short. I'm an hi-fi enthusiast since 1971 (I was 16 at that time !). Going to the cartridges I owned so many as 42 carts in one time, including some of the most expensive and reputated like Ortofon, Fidelity Research, Dynavector, EMT, Accuphase .... and I could go on. After this experience I ended up with the personal idea that some MM carts are simply "closer" to the master tape as "a whole" (analog tapes, of course) much more than extremely expensive MCs. MCs tend to "interpret", they may excel in some specific parameters and this maybe extremely nice to some ears, but it is NOT corresponding to what has been recorded.* [/ ` ^, R$ a# ~" v; V' b
& w# V1 {4 s5 h# h* B0 |
用我的话来讲就是,MC都对,但是并不好,是不是因为我的唱片还不够NM,我个人觉得这是主要原因,MC把错误也放大了,然后对后续的配套要求又很苛刻,三转两转其实我已无法知道到底是那个环节出了问题。* T- g: y2 T7 }5 V! P; j( Q
% I G) f6 H, [. B' b8 [T4P也是设计精品,但价格炒得比较高,我就不参与了, |
|